2001 (6) TMI 228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ants. Shri R.C. Sankhla, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - These applications seeking rectification of mistake and recall of the Final Order Nos. 392-393/2000-D, dated 22-11-2000 have been moved by the appellants. 2. The appellants filed two appeal Nos. E/682/89-D against two orders, dated 31-3-1992 and 27-12-1992 of the Collector (Appeals). The issu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng with the gum or starch so as to hold conclusively that it falls within the ambit of Chapter 52 of the CETA." The observations recorded in para 13 of the Final Order read as : "For want of requisite material or evidence before us it is difficult to decide the proper classification of the cotton fabric in question. The matter in our view deserves to be sent back to the adjudicating authorit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....observations deserve to be recalled and if not clarified that the same will not influence the decision of the adjudicating authority. 6. On the other hand, the learned SDR has argued that there is no mistake apparent on the face of the record and as such the present applications of the appellants seeking rectification/recall of the impugned Final Order is misconceived and deserve to be dis....