Rectification and recall cannot reopen a final classification order without an apparent error on the record.

Rectification cannot be used to reopen a final CEGAT order unless a mistake of fact or law apparent on the face of the record is shown. The Tribunal found that its earlier observations on classification under Chapter 52 were based on the material then available, and mere dissatisfaction with those findings did not justify recall. It also held that the remand for fresh decision did not restrict the adjudicating authority's power to determine the classification issue afresh in accordance with law, and no ambiguity existed requiring clarification. The applications for rectification, recall, and clarification were therefore rejected, leaving the remand order intact.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's final order warranted rectification, recall, or clarification on the ground that its observations on classification and remand would prejudice the adjudicating authority.

Analysis: The applications sought to reopen the Tribunal's earlier final order under the guise of rectification and recall. The Tribunal found that the observations in the earlier order were made on the basis of the material on record and were recorded because the evidence was insufficient to accept the claim of classification under Chapter 52. It held that no mistake of fact or law apparent on the face of the record was shown, and dissatisfaction with the findings could not justify recall of the order. The Tribunal further held that the remand for fresh decision did not curtail the adjudicating authority's power to decide the classification issue afresh in accordance with law, and there was no ambiguity requiring clarification.

Conclusion: The applications for rectification, recall, and clarification were not maintainable and were rejected.

Final Conclusion: The earlier remand order remained intact, and the adjudicating authority's discretion to decide the classification issue afresh was unaffected.

Ratio Decidendi: Rectification cannot be used to recall or reopen a final order in the absence of a mistake apparent on the face of the record, and a remand order does not limit the authority's power to decide the matter afresh according to law.

---