2000 (11) TMI 550
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Shri J.M. George, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (T)]. - In this case, the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was denied to the appellant on the ground that they were clearing the goods i.e. Typing machine under the brand name of foreign manufacturer. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant said that the appellants were importing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l Printery & Ors. is dismissed by the Supreme Court and the Board has issued a Circular dated 18-1-2000 to decide the pending cases as per the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Vimal Printery & Ors. He, therefore, submits that the appeal be allowed. 3. Learned SDR reiterates the finding of the lower authority. In the present case the appellants were importing the components and parts....
TaxTMI