<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 550 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95767</link>
    <description>Small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was available because the disqualification applies only where the specified goods are manufactured under or with the brand name or trade name of another person. The assessee used imported components bearing a foreign manufacturer&#039;s name, but did not affix any brand name or trade name of another person on the final goods. On that basis, the denial of exemption was held unsustainable and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:48:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 550 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95767</link>
      <description>Small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was available because the disqualification applies only where the specified goods are manufactured under or with the brand name or trade name of another person. The assessee used imported components bearing a foreign manufacturer&#039;s name, but did not affix any brand name or trade name of another person on the final goods. On that basis, the denial of exemption was held unsustainable and relief was granted to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>