Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (1) TMI 330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atel, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - This appeal from the Revenue was argued by Shri B.K. Choubey. Shri J.C. Patel, Advocate, represented the respondents. 2. The respondents imported ''hologram labels". The importers claimed classification under heading 4910 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Show cause notice was issued claiming classificatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... products under heading 3919.90. The subsequent proceeding would be bound to be within the framework of the show cause notice. The application caused by the Commissioner to be made before the Commissioner (Appeals) itself was wrong inasmuch as it claimed classification different from what was alleged in the show cause notice. On the same ground he submits that the present appeal is also bad in law....