<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 330 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95376</link>
    <description>Departmental proceedings initiated under section 129D of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot travel beyond the scope of the original show cause notice. Where the notice proposed classification of imported goods under heading 3919.90, a subsequent challenge seeking to sustain a different classification was impermissible because it was not founded on the notice. Applying the same principle as under the analogous Central Excise framework, the Revenue appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=132435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 330 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95376</link>
      <description>Departmental proceedings initiated under section 129D of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot travel beyond the scope of the original show cause notice. Where the notice proposed classification of imported goods under heading 3919.90, a subsequent challenge seeking to sustain a different classification was impermissible because it was not founded on the notice. Applying the same principle as under the analogous Central Excise framework, the Revenue appeal was held not maintainable and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=95376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>