1999 (11) TMI 388

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i M.H. Patil, Advocate, Arun Mehta, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T). - The issue involved in this appeal is whether there could be different assessable values in respect of the excisable goods supplied to more than one industrial consumers. 2. We have heard Shri K.M. Patwari, the ld DR for the Revenue, who reiterated the grounds as contained in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Central Excise Act, 1944. He also submitted that in subsequent decisions the Tribunal has held that there could be different prices for different classes of buyers, one of such case is Godrej Soaps Ltd v. CCE Mumbai II [1999 (111) E.L.T. 374] wherein the Tribunal following the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Metal Box India Ltd v. CCE [1995 (75) E.L.T. 449 (S.C.)] held that differen....