1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Upholds Pricing Disparity for Excisable Goods</h1> The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the practice of charging different prices for excisable goods supplied to various industrial consumers, ... Valuation The appeal dealt with the issue of different assessable values for excisable goods supplied to multiple industrial consumers. The Tribunal ruled that different prices for different classes of buyers are permissible under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, citing previous cases like Travancore Cement Ltd v. CCE and Godrej Soaps Ltd v. CCE. The appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected as the goods were sold at a lower rate to a bulk purchaser who was an industrial consumer.