2000 (6) TMI 349
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Appellant. Shri G. Prabhakara Sastry, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Asthana, Member (T)]. - On consideration of Revenue stay application in this appeal on 15-3-2000, this Tribunal had issued a Misc. Order No. 140/2000, dated 15-3-2000 in which the ld. Commissioner had been directed to comply with the following requirements to complete the records before us :- ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed to 16-5-2000. On 16-5-2000, the respondents requested for further adjournment due to personal inconvenience which was also granted. Hence, the matter is now being considered today. 3. Vide their compliance report dated 25-5-2000, the ld. DR has enclosed copies of communication dated 19-5-2000, received by him from the Commissionerate concerned, wherein the Joint Commissioner has reporte....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Division-II, Visakhapatanam and by a letter dated 10-9-99 to the present respondents, the said Superintendent had demanded duty of Rs. 23,854/- to be paid. In this connection, we find that the order impugned had remanded the matter to the Asstt. Collector of Central Excise for finalisation of the provisional assessment. Revenue being aggrived by this remand had come in appeal along with stay appl....
TaxTMI