<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 349 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93893</link>
    <description>A departmental appeal is not maintainable when the authorisation relied upon was not validly in force at the time of filing; the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on that ground. Provisional assessment was also held not to have been finalised in accordance with law because finalisation had to be undertaken by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, not the Range Superintendent, and the earlier Tribunal directions were not properly complied with; this issue was decided against the Revenue as well. The appeal and stay applications were therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:16:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 349 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93893</link>
      <description>A departmental appeal is not maintainable when the authorisation relied upon was not validly in force at the time of filing; the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected on that ground. Provisional assessment was also held not to have been finalised in accordance with law because finalisation had to be undertaken by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, not the Range Superintendent, and the earlier Tribunal directions were not properly complied with; this issue was decided against the Revenue as well. The appeal and stay applications were therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>