Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (4) TMI 301

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Smt. Aruna N. Gupta, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. -  In both these appeals a common question of law and facts are involved and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law. 2. Appeal No. E/2105 arises from Order-in-Original No. 5/90, dated 27-2-1990 passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise & Customs, Trichy confirmin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 1986 (25) E.L.T. 580. (b) SAIL v. C.C.E. as reported in 1988 (36) E.L.T. 316. (c) SAE (India) Ltd. v. C.C.E. as reported in 1988 (36) E.L.T. 613. In the impugned order the adjudicating authority has held that he does not want to enter into a legal battle to consider as to whether cutting, drilling and welding of MS steel materials in the factory of the appellants to make them ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... re-examined in a number of cases as reported in [1999 (107) E.L.T. 337 (T) - 1999 (31) RLT 5] in the case of Elcon Engineering Co. Ltd. v. C.C.E., Chandigarh & Ors. and it was held by the Tribunal that the various items mentioned therein i.e. Trestles, Structures etc. used for steel structures such as columns, does not amount to manufacture even though these items are merely mentioned in the tari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case cited supra. 6. The learned DR reiterates the view taken by the authorities below. 7. On consideration of the submissions made we notice that the Tribunal has already decided the issue in appellants' own case [1996 (88) E.L.T. 407] by holding that the process of cutting, and punching of holes in angles and channels would not amount to manufacture as no new commodity emerges. ....