Manufacture test for structural steel processing: cutting, drilling, punching, and welding alone do not create excisable goods.

Mere cutting, drilling, punching, or welding of MS steel materials for prefabricated buildings and structures does not amount to manufacture unless a new and distinct commodity emerges. The Tribunal reiterated that angles, channels, trestles, and similar structural steel items used in construction do not become excisable simply because they are mentioned in a tariff heading. Where the adjudication rests only on tariff description and does not address the manufacture test on merits, duty cannot be sustained on that basis alone. The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether cutting, drilling, punching, and welding of MS steel materials for fabrication of pre-fabricated buildings and structures amounted to manufacture, and whether duty could be sustained merely because the items were mentioned in the tariff heading.

Analysis: The issue had already been decided in the assessee's own case, where similar processing of angles and channels was held not to amount to manufacture because no new commodity emerged. The Tribunal also relied on its earlier view that trestles, structures, and similar steel items used in construction do not become excisable merely because they are referred to in a tariff heading. The adjudication below had proceeded mainly on the tariff description without answering the manufacture question on merits.

Conclusion: The processing did not amount to manufacture, and the demand could not be sustained on the basis of tariff description alone.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Mere cutting, drilling, punching, or welding of steel materials, without emergence of a new and distinct commodity, does not constitute manufacture, and tariff enumeration by itself does not make such goods excisable.

---