Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1997 (9) TMI 339

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)].- Case called none appeared on behalf of the appellants. However, we find that issue involved in this case has been covered by the ratio of the decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Jindal Strips Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, reported in 1997 (94) E.L.T. 234 (Tribunal) = 1997 (21) RLT 275 (CEGAT-Larger Bench). 2. Whe....

PrevPreviousNextNext