<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 339 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92878</link>
    <description>Spare parts imported as refractory bricks were treated as components for exemption under Notification No. 156/86-Cus., because the applicable Larger Bench interpretation held that component parts in the notification include spare parts intended for use as such. On that construction, refractory bricks imported for spare-parts use qualified for the exemption, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:59:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=129939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 339 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92878</link>
      <description>Spare parts imported as refractory bricks were treated as components for exemption under Notification No. 156/86-Cus., because the applicable Larger Bench interpretation held that component parts in the notification include spare parts intended for use as such. On that construction, refractory bricks imported for spare-parts use qualified for the exemption, and the assessee was entitled to the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=92878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>