1998 (9) TMI 316

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S.N. Sejpal, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  The Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I has filed this appeal against the order dated 3-5-1994 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The Respondents are engaged in the manufacture of goods falling under Chapter 34 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and are availing of Modvat credit facility ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as passed the impugned order by which he set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order by relying upon the Tribunal decision in the case of Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation v. CCE - 1991 (53) E.L.T. 128. 2. The ld. DR Shri S. Suman contended that the Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in relying on the decision of the Tribunal in Kerala State Electronic Development Corporation....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....claration under Rule 57G on 17-4-1990 and not on 22-2-1990 and the acknowledgment on their declaration on 17-4-1990 is also on their letter itself which was dated 29-3-1990. He also referred to the Assistant Commissioner's letter dated 23-5-1990 stating that the Respondents letter dated 29-3-1990 was received on 22-5-1990. It was further submitted that as per entry in their 23A Part I account the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt appeal. In that case the declaration had been acknowledged in June 1987 and the assessee took credit on the inputs received earlier in the month of May, 1987 on 30-6-1987 which was after the acknowledgement of their declaration. The department objected to this on the ground that the inputs had been received much earlier to the declaration and that the assessee ought to have followed the procedu....