Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible where the inputs had been received before filing of the declaration, but the credit was taken only after receipt of the dated acknowledgement under Rule 57G.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied its earlier view that Rule 57G did not bar credit merely because the inputs had been received before the declaration, provided the manufacturer took credit only after obtaining the dated acknowledgement of the declaration. It also relied on the principle that the procedural requirement should not defeat the credit when the assessee had not taken credit on receipt of the inputs and had acted after acknowledgement of the declaration. The facts were found to be materially similar to the earlier decision relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals).
Conclusion: Modvat credit was held admissible, and the appeal by the Revenue was rejected.