1997 (11) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arat Agro Ind. Corpn. Ltd., w.e.f. 1-4-1984. The unit was not eligible for the concession covered under Notification No. 175/86, dated 1-3-1986 as their principal unit was not coming under the preview of exemption under the said notification. Their S.S.I. registration has not been got amended. The said unit availed the said exemption under Notification 175/86, dated 1-3-1986 as amended, for the period from 1-1-1988 to 15-1-1988 and paid duty at concessional rate of 5% Adv. on the clearances and hence they are required to pay differential amount @ 5% on their said clearances. 1.2 A S.C.N., dated 14-4-1988 had been issued demanding differential duty. 1.3 The respondents did not reply to the said S.C.N. and continued prolonging....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n was cancelled the appellant will be covered under para 4 (b) of Notification No. 175/86-C.E., dated 1-3-1986 as amended, inasmuch as he had not considered the other conditions and requirements of the said exemption Notification e.g. for the purpose of exemption under Notification 175/86-C.E., the main criterion being that aggregate clearance value of specified goods cleared by a manufacturer from one or more factories during the year in which the exemption is availed and hence the Order-in-Appeal, if at all, can only be conditional subject to all other conditions of the notification being satisfied. 2. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondents in spite of the notice of hearing having been served on them. Hence, we have peru....