<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 341 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91109</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was confined to units satisfying the prescribed small-scale industry conditions, so cancellation of SSI registration and failure to secure a valid renewal or amendment defeated the claim after amalgamation. A pending request for amendment did not suffice, because the notification condition was substantive rather than a mere formality. The record also did not show that the amalgamated unit independently met the small-scale requirements. The exemption was therefore unavailable, the duty demand was confirmed, and the Department&#039;s appeal succeeded with the order of the Collector (Appeals) set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:11:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=128171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 341 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91109</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. was confined to units satisfying the prescribed small-scale industry conditions, so cancellation of SSI registration and failure to secure a valid renewal or amendment defeated the claim after amalgamation. A pending request for amendment did not suffice, because the notification condition was substantive rather than a mere formality. The record also did not show that the amalgamated unit independently met the small-scale requirements. The exemption was therefore unavailable, the duty demand was confirmed, and the Department&#039;s appeal succeeded with the order of the Collector (Appeals) set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=91109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>