Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 310

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - In this appeal filed by M/s. Uptron India Ltd., the matter relates to the refund in respect of telephone exchange with console (Model RAX) which was cleared on payment of duty for equipment testing and was received back by the appellants for further processing. The refund claim had been rejected on the ground that the same was not covered by the provisions of Rule 173L of the Central Excise R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellants filed a refund claim on 7-7-1995. 5. There is no dispute that the goods had actually been received back. It is also clear that originally they had been cleared on payment of Central Excise duty. The Revenue had written back to the appellants on 25-7-1995 to furnish relevant information with regard to the provisions of Rule 173L of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 which was submit....