Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 309

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Revenue. 2. Whether the claim for classification under CET sub-headings 4818.12 and 4818.19 in the classification list filed w.e.f. 1-3-1987 amounts to suppression or mis-statement on the part of the appellants, giving rise to the applicability of the extended period of limitation. 2. Learned Counsel Shri V. Sridharan, states at the outset that, in the case of the same assessees, 1995 (76) E.L.T. 350 the Tribunal has upheld classification under CET sub-heading 4818.90 holding that although multiwall paper may be containers, in the context of the expression used in sub-heading 4818 (sic), the non rigid paper containers manufactured by the appellants do not fall in line with the boxes and cartons which are necessarily of rigid typ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....proved on 27-1-1987 under CET sub-heading 4818.90 for both varieties of paper bags. He relies upon the decision of the Tribunal in the cases of M/s. Detiners Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Bombay - Final Order No. 370/88-B1, dated 6-9-1988 in which it was held that "it is expected of Central Excise authorities to compare classification list of earlier orders with the new classification lists filed and if there was a discrepancy, the same should and would have been noted. In this view of the matter, we hold that the failure on the part of the appellants to declare the scrap in the classification list during the period 1980 to 1983 cannot be held to be with intent to evade payment of duty. Learned Counsel states that this order of the Tribunal has been fo....