1998 (6) TMI 283
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both the sides. Some relevant facts for disposal of the present application are as follows :- Commissioner (A) vide his order as communicated by the Superintendent (A) on 15-12-1995 by a telegram allowed the stay petition of the applicants herein observing as follows :- "After carefully considering the stay application and submissions at the time of per....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he records. The applicants, therefore, prayed to the Commissioner (A) that they should be given atleast one hearing in the case to place their grievance before him. 2. But it appears that the Commissioner (A) did not pay heed to the aforesaid request of the applicants and passed the impugned order dated 18-3-1998 observing that since the applicants failed to comply with the directions in t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....4-3-1998. In view of the fact that the applicant had been given unconditional stay by the lower appellate authority but the subsequent Commissioner (A) passing the impugned order has acted very arbitrarily, I allow the stay petition unconditionally. 5. At this stage ld. Advocate draws my attention to an order passed by the Assistant Collector, namely the detention order dated 24-3-1998 pas....
TaxTMI