<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90505</link>
    <description>Unconditional stay against recovery was granted where the appeal had been dismissed for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement without giving the appellant an opportunity of hearing, and the earlier stay order had been vacated arbitrarily. The tribunal also restrained auction of the detained goods during pendency of the appeal, directing the department not to sell the goods until disposal of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=127567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90505</link>
      <description>Unconditional stay against recovery was granted where the appeal had been dismissed for alleged non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement without giving the appellant an opportunity of hearing, and the earlier stay order had been vacated arbitrarily. The tribunal also restrained auction of the detained goods during pendency of the appeal, directing the department not to sell the goods until disposal of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=90505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>