Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. -  The assessee, the respondent to this appeal had cleared some goods on payment of duty on 22-12-1988. The goods were seized while they were in transit from its factory and the case registered regarding them. Pending adjudication the goods were permitted to be cleared provisionallly and the assessees cleared them on pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2. We have heard the Departmental Representative. The respondent is absent despite notice issued when the case was adjourned. 3. Release of goods pending adjudication is provided for in Rule 206. This rule does not refer to payment of duty. There is nothing to support the view that duty which may be paid by a person when the goods are provisionally released is itself provisional. It ....