1998 (10) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....D. Negi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : A.C.C. Unni, Member (J)]. -  The only issue for consideration in this Appeal is whether the goods cleared by the appellants were Flats or Rectangular bars. Shri Kulvinder Singh, ld. Counsel for appellants stated that though in the Declaration and Classification Lists filed by the appellants they had described the goods as 'Flats', in their....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or of Central Excise, New Delhi - 1996 (87) E.L.T. 188 (Tribunal) in which refund claim of the assessee was allowed even though the same had not been claimed in the Classification Lists. 2. Defending the impugned order ld. JDR submitted that the assessee was fully aware of the nature, thickness and width of the product they were producing when they filed their Declaration and Classificatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and paid duty according to the rates relevant to 'Flats'. It was after realising that their goods, being Rectangular bars do not correspond to the specifications relating to 'Flats' that they had claimed refund and they had supported their claim by the description given in their GP 1s mentioning the thickness and width of their product which was more than 5 mm in thickness and 75 mm width which w....