<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of goods as Flats or Rectangular bars. The appellants were granted the consequential reliefs sought, with any refund subject to the law of unjust enrichment to prevent unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:00:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 204 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of goods as Flats or Rectangular bars. The appellants were granted the consequential reliefs sought, with any refund subject to the law of unjust enrichment to prevent unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>