Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri Joseph Vellapally, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Monica Singhal and Shri Tarun Gulati, Advocates for the Respondents. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - The issue involved in this appeal is eligibility to exemption under Notification No. 154/86 for the product called "Zero-B" manufactured by the respondents. The notification exempts water filters of a capacity not exceeding 40 lit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ter purifiers. The filter is, therefore, a purifying apparatus. Shri Vellapally also submits that the appeal is the result of confusion between the process and the result. Filteration is a process and purification is the result. He submits that it was an absurd proposition to deny the exemption because the item brings about the purification even though the process followed is filteration. 3.&em....