<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89795</link>
    <description>The product &quot;Zero-B&quot; was treated as a water filter because it operated on the principle of filtration by passing water through a filtering medium. The fact that filtration also produced purification did not change its essential character, as the distinction between the process of filtration and the result of purification was accepted. On that basis, the product was held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 154/86.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:23:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 258 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89795</link>
      <description>The product &quot;Zero-B&quot; was treated as a water filter because it operated on the principle of filtration by passing water through a filtering medium. The fact that filtration also produced purification did not change its essential character, as the distinction between the process of filtration and the result of purification was accepted. On that basis, the product was held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 154/86.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>