Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (6) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent. [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the classification of the Niknaks potato wafer not put up in unit containers. The respondents, M/s. Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd. have sought classification of the potato wafers under sub-heading No. 2001.90 of the new Central Excise Tariff. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ading No. 2001.10 the potato wafer put up in unit containers and ordinarily intended for sale were classifiable. The potato wafer which were not put up in unit containers were not classifiable. The view taken by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise that even when the goods were not put up in unit containers and if the same were ordinarily intended for sale, then it would be taken as if the go....