<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89078</link>
    <description>Potato wafers were held not classifiable under the tariff heading for wafers ordinarily intended for sale because the entry required two cumulative conditions: the goods had to be put up in unit containers and be ordinarily intended for sale. The trade notice supported classification under Heading 20.01, but it did not remove the separate unit-container requirement. As the wafers were not put up in unit containers, the lower appellate authority&#039;s classification was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contention was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:31:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=126141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89078</link>
      <description>Potato wafers were held not classifiable under the tariff heading for wafers ordinarily intended for sale because the entry required two cumulative conditions: the goods had to be put up in unit containers and be ordinarily intended for sale. The trade notice supported classification under Heading 20.01, but it did not remove the separate unit-container requirement. As the wafers were not put up in unit containers, the lower appellate authority&#039;s classification was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contention was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=89078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>