Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (3) TMI 373

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri S. Nunthuk, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. - Case called. None appeared on behalf of the appellants. There is no adjournment request. In these circumstances, the case is dismissed for default in appearance under Rule 20 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. 2. Later on Shri Harbans Singh appeared and requested for restoration of the appeal whi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....party was known to the department. He also pointed out that issue with reference to the limitation has also not been considered. 4. On seeing the reply and the impugned order Shri Nunthuk has no objection to remand the matter. 5. We have carefully considered the matter. When once the assessee has taken the plea with reference to the marketability and limitation it was the duty of t....