Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the assessee's plea that the ring manufactured and captively used in tyres for animal-driven vehicles was not marketable required adjudication; (ii) whether the assessee's plea that the demand was barred by limitation required adjudication.
Issue (i): whether the assessee's plea that the ring manufactured and captively used in tyres for animal-driven vehicles was not marketable required adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee had specifically raised the issue of marketability in reply to the show cause notice. The adjudicating authority was required to examine that plea and return a clear finding, but no such consideration or finding was recorded.
Conclusion: The issue was not decided on merits and was sent back for fresh consideration.
Issue (ii): whether the assessee's plea that the demand was barred by limitation required adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee had also raised limitation as a specific defence, but the adjudicating authority did not consider it or record any finding thereon. The matter therefore required reconsideration on that issue as well.
Conclusion: The issue was not decided on merits and was sent back for fresh consideration.
Final Conclusion: The adjudication was set aside to the extent necessary and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on marketability and limitation after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: When a specific defence such as marketability or limitation is raised, the adjudicating authority must examine it and record clear findings; failure to do so justifies remand for fresh adjudication.