Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bead wire rings manufactured by the assessee and captively consumed in the manufacture of animal-drawn vehicle and hand-cart tyres were marketable and therefore excisable.
Analysis: The only substantive question was whether the goods could be treated as excisable intermediate goods. The Revenue had to establish marketability. The evidence showed that the product was a rubberised bead wire ring with a very short shelf life, intended for use within a few hours of manufacture. The material relied upon by the Revenue did not establish that the assessee's product was actually marketed or had sufficient shelf life to reach the market. Similar products referred to by the Revenue were not shown to be identical to the assessee's product, and the fact that another manufacturer paid duty on a similar item was not ative of marketability. On the evidence, the Department failed to discharge the burden of proving that the goods were marketable.
Conclusion: The bead wire rings were not marketable and hence not excisable; the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Marketability is a condition precedent to excisability, and where the Revenue fails to prove that a captively consumed intermediate product has sufficient shelf life to be sold in the market, duty cannot be levied on it.