Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether resin at 'A' stage, chemically known as 'resols', produced in the course of manufacture and captively consumed in the manufacture of laminated sheets, was exigible to excise duty despite being specified in the tariff and despite the absence of actual sale.
Analysis: The Act fastens duty on excisable goods produced or manufactured, but the concept of manufacture is linked to the existence of goods that are distinct, usable, movable and marketable. Goods specified in the tariff do not attract duty unless they answer the test of marketability or are at least capable of being marketed. The intermediate resin solution here was unstable, required stabiliser or controlled conditions to survive, and was used in semi-processed form in a continuous process of manufacture; captive consumption by itself did not create dutiability. The tariff entry for resols could not override the basic requirement that the article must be marketable or capable of being marketed.
Conclusion: Resin at 'A' stage, i.e. resols, was not exigible to duty because it was not shown to be marketable or capable of being marketed.
Ratio Decidendi: Even if an intermediate product is specifically mentioned in the tariff, excise duty is not attracted unless the article is marketable or capable of being marketed as goods.