<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 384 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106783</link>
    <description>Marketability is a condition precedent to excisability of captively consumed intermediate goods. Rubberised bead wire rings used in manufacturing animal-drawn vehicle and hand-cart tyres had a very short shelf life and were intended for use within hours of manufacture. The Revenue did not establish that these rings were actually marketed, could reach the market, or were identical to similar products relied upon for comparison. Payment of duty by another manufacturer on a similar item did not prove marketability. Consequently, the rings were not excisable, and the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:36:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=143803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 384 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106783</link>
      <description>Marketability is a condition precedent to excisability of captively consumed intermediate goods. Rubberised bead wire rings used in manufacturing animal-drawn vehicle and hand-cart tyres had a very short shelf life and were intended for use within hours of manufacture. The Revenue did not establish that these rings were actually marketed, could reach the market, or were identical to similar products relied upon for comparison. Payment of duty by another manufacturer on a similar item did not prove marketability. Consequently, the rings were not excisable, and the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=106783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>