Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1997 (3) TMI 176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellants. Shri K. Srivastava, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. -  The short point to be considered in these appeals is whether Nyloc Nut was classifiable under entry 52 or 68 of the erstwhile Tariff. 2. The party claimed that nut manufactured by the assessee known as Nyloc nut was classifiable under 68 of the Central Excise Tariff but....

PrevPreviousNextNext