Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (3) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. -  The common Order-in-Appeal Nos. 127 to 129/87 (Md), dated 30-9-1987 passed by the Collector (Appeals) Central Excise, Madras, is being challenged in these three appeals. The order passed by the Collector (Appeals) refers to three appeals against orders dated 22-1-1987, 3-2-1987 and 18-3-1987 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Virudh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Board stating that notional manufacturing profit of 10% has to be added to the assessable value. Notices were resisted by the Board. However, the Assistant Collector passed orders confirming the proposal. These orders have been confirmed by the Collector (Appeals). 3. Appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing. We have heard Shri T.R. Malik, SDR and perused the papers. 4. It i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rned on the manufacture of R.C.C. Poles and therefore notional profit should not be added to the assessable value. 6. Valuation of excisable goods captively consumed is governed by 6(b) of the Valuation Rules. The appellant has no contention that the assessable value should have been determined under sub-clause (i) of Rule 6(b) of the Rules. Assistant Collector has determined the value under....