1995 (2) TMI 196
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Applicants. Shri K.S. Nair, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This miscellaneous application seeks to modify the terms of the Interim Order No. 591 to 594/94-WRB, dated 26-12-1994 passed by this Bench ordering the applicants to deposit Rs. 15.00 lacs in cash towards duty. The question relates to the allegation that some of the intravenous fluid c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(75) E.L.T. 214 (SC) have held that merely carrying a monogram for identifying the manufacturer cannot be said to be a branded medicine for purpose of Item 14E of the erstwhile CET. In this case, the only allegation is that + (plus) mark was found in the bottom of the container which is alleged to be a monogram. IV Fluids are not branded medicine in terms of the Supreme Court decision. The said ru....
TaxTMI