<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 196 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84104</link>
    <description>An interim pre-deposit order in a customs matter was modified where a later Supreme Court ruling strengthened the assessee&#039;s prima facie case on merits, particularly on the issue whether a mere identifying monogram makes goods branded. The earlier cash deposit condition was replaced by a personal bond for the duty amount, to be furnished within four weeks and complied with within five weeks. On compliance, recovery of the duty amount would remain stayed, and the modification operated in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=121248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 196 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84104</link>
      <description>An interim pre-deposit order in a customs matter was modified where a later Supreme Court ruling strengthened the assessee&#039;s prima facie case on merits, particularly on the issue whether a mere identifying monogram makes goods branded. The earlier cash deposit condition was replaced by a personal bond for the duty amount, to be furnished within four weeks and complied with within five weeks. On compliance, recovery of the duty amount would remain stayed, and the modification operated in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=84104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>