1990 (10) TMI 226
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nbsp;Shri K.M. Mondal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - In the hearing which took place on 22-8-1990, Shri D.M. Mehta, the ld. Consultant, on behalf of the applicants/appellants pleaded that there is a gross violation of principles of natural justice in this case. The applicants/appellants' factory was under labour trouble. Earlier, in reply to the first sho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....aring which took place today, Shri Mondal produced the original records and argued that the reply to the second show cause notice, even if it is received, would not have been considered by the adjudicating authority, since the order has already been passed on the noting side as early as on 9-11-1989 and the letter is stated to have been received only on 29-12-1989. He showed the order on the notin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e the discrepancy in RG 1 record, on the basis of which allegation of removal has been made. We find that the Addl. Collector has not given them proper time for re-conciliation, resulting in passing the impugned order. We are also satisfied that the reply to the second show cause notice as well as the earlier show cause notice have been filed requesting for offering such an opportunity. In the cir....
TaxTMI