<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 226 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83816</link>
    <description>An ex parte adjudication passed without affording a reasonable opportunity to reconcile records, explain the discrepancy, or present a defence was held to violate natural justice. The authority had proceeded despite material indicating that replies were sent and without granting a fair hearing. The order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with directions to examine the appellants&#039; reply and grant personal hearing if requested.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 226 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83816</link>
      <description>An ex parte adjudication passed without affording a reasonable opportunity to reconcile records, explain the discrepancy, or present a defence was held to violate natural justice. The authority had proceeded despite material indicating that replies were sent and without granting a fair hearing. The order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with directions to examine the appellants&#039; reply and grant personal hearing if requested.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>