Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1994 (6) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondents. [Order]. - When Appeal No. C/3235/90-NRB was taken up for consideration, Shri R.C. Pandey, the ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that it is a case pertaining to an immigrant fleeing for his life from a country in disturbed conditions and it was in this peculiar circumstances that he received the order-in-original. As the Advocates who were entrusted wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Bhagat, the ld. JDR appearing for the respondent submitted that the provisions for Condonation of Delay are very clear and that the law required that everyday's delay should be properly explained to meet the requirement of sufficient cause. The ld. JDR submitted that though the provisions may be harsh yet they are to be dealt with the extra case and that the law is very specific in regard to this....