<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 72 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83332</link>
    <description>A 10-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellant showed sufficient cause based on fleeing a disturbed country and the late intimation given to the advocates handling the filing. The Tribunal treated these as special and peculiar circumstances justifying the short delay, admitted the appeal, and set aside the impugned order without deciding the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 72 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83332</link>
      <description>A 10-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellant showed sufficient cause based on fleeing a disturbed country and the late intimation given to the advocates handling the filing. The Tribunal treated these as special and peculiar circumstances justifying the short delay, admitted the appeal, and set aside the impugned order without deciding the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>