1994 (3) TMI 205
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts. Shri M.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)]. - This is a case in which the appellants herein are required to pay duty amounting to Rs. 5,13,930 and penalty of Rs. 50,000 in terms of the impugned order of the Principal Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi. They had filed a Stay Application alongwith the appeal. The Tribunal disposed of the s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nformed on that date that the Court had further adjourned the case to 22-2-1994. The Bench then issued a notice for dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with reference to provision of Section 35F of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Presently the matter is listed for considering the reply to the show cause notice. A reply to the notice has been handed over today by the learned Counsel who ....
TaxTMI