<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83118</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was treated as mandatory for hearing the appeal. The appellants were granted time, including extended time, to deposit the duty amount but did not comply, and no High Court stay of the Tribunal&#039;s order was produced. On that basis, the appeal remained conditional on compliance with the pre-deposit requirement and was dismissed for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=120263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83118</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was treated as mandatory for hearing the appeal. The appellants were granted time, including extended time, to deposit the duty amount but did not comply, and no High Court stay of the Tribunal&#039;s order was produced. On that basis, the appeal remained conditional on compliance with the pre-deposit requirement and was dismissed for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=83118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>