Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (11) TMI 389

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balansundaram, Vice-President]. - The authorities below have denied the benefit of small scale exemption to the assessees herein during the period 1996-97 upto 1999-2000 on "online UPS" and "invertors" manufactured by them on the ground that the goods bore the brand name "CANSOFT" which belonged to M/s. Cansoft Systems Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of CSP. We, therefore, see no merit in the submission that brand name "CANSOFT" did not belong to CSP. However, we find force in the submission that the extended period of limitation is not available to the Department against the assessees for the reason that during the period in dispute, the law as it stood was to the effect that the use of brand name of the manufacturer of goods different from t....