<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 389 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77394</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal concerning the denial of small scale exemption on goods bearing the brand name &quot;CANSOFT.&quot; The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable, as the assessees did not engage in suppression or misstatement to evade duty payment. The demand within the normal limitation period was upheld, while the demand beyond that period was set aside. The Tribunal directed the recalibration of duty demand within the normal period and a reconsideration of the penalty imposition after granting the assessees a fair hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=115563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 389 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77394</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI partially allowed the appeal concerning the denial of small scale exemption on goods bearing the brand name &quot;CANSOFT.&quot; The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation was not applicable, as the assessees did not engage in suppression or misstatement to evade duty payment. The demand within the normal limitation period was upheld, while the demand beyond that period was set aside. The Tribunal directed the recalibration of duty demand within the normal period and a reconsideration of the penalty imposition after granting the assessees a fair hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>