Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 471

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....assisted by B.B. Agrawal, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. The Appellant filed this Appeal against the impugned Order whereby pro-rata credit has been disallowed in respect of inputs used in the captive power plant. Part of the electricity generated is supplied to residential premises and sold to M/s. NESCO. Case of the Revenue is that the Appellant availed credit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly used for the manufacturing operation in the factory and some portion of the electricity is used in the Company's township/residential colony and some part is sold. Contention is that as the boiler is required to cool down the temperature of gases emitted from the kiln, certain chemicals are used in the boiler. Therefore, it cannot be said that the chemicals used in the boiler are used entirely ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... used in or in relation to manufacture of final product; therefore, proportionate credit in respect of the duty paid on inputs used in the captive power plant for generation of electricity is not admissible. 5. In reply, the Appellant tried to distinguish their case from the facts in the case of Maruti Suzuki (supra). 6. I find in the present case that as per the affidavit filed by the Appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Court in the case of Raillis India Ltd. (supra). The Hon'ble High Court held that in case a common input is used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted products, the manufacturer is not liable to pay duty as per the provisions of Rule 57CC of the erstwhile Central Excise 1944 in respect of the waste. I find that in the present case, Revenue is asking for reversal of credit in respect of the i....