Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on duty-paid chemicals used in the boiler of a captive power plant, where the resulting electricity was partly used in manufacture and partly supplied to residential premises or sold outside the factory.
Analysis: The chemicals were used in the boiler to generate steam for running the turbine and producing electricity. The electricity so generated was not wholly consumed in the manufacturing process, because a part of it was used in the township and a part was sold outside the factory. In such circumstances, the input credit attributable to electricity not used in or in relation to manufacture of the final product was not admissible. The earlier decision relied upon by the appellant on common inputs and waste under Rule 57CC of the erstwhile Central Excise regime did not govern the present facts.
Conclusion: Credit was not admissible to the extent attributable to electricity used otherwise than in or in relation to manufacture of Sponge Iron, and the disallowance was upheld against the assessee.