TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (7) TMI 603
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....G. Karnik, JJ. Shri L.S. Shetty, for the Petitioner. Ms. N.V. Masurkar, for the Respondent. [Order].- P.C. : The petitioners by the present petition impugns the order dated 27thJune, 1986 passed by the Additional Controller of Imports and Exports and the order dated 11th August 1988 passed by the Appellate Committee. 2. At the hearing of this petition, on behalf of the petitioners, their....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... signed it. If such a plea had been taken, the respondents could have produced the record. Learned counsel then submits that he may be permitted to amend the petition. 4. We find from the order of the Appellate Committee that the order itself states that the matter was heard by the Committee in the presence of advocates for the parties and the party himself. In the last part of the order, t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te Authority, we find that what the petitioners were doing was merely cutting the sheets and selling them to third parties. These are clearly finding of fact. In fact, from the order of the Original Authority dated 27th June, 1986 we find that the Appellate Authority had earlier remanded the matter to the Original Authority giving an opportunity to the petitioners for leading the evidence. The add....