<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 603 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76231</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the orders passed by the Additional Controller of Imports and Exports and the Appellate Committee. The Court found that the decision was made by the Committee, as stated in the order, and upheld the findings that the petitioners misused imported raw material. The Court ruled that no interference was warranted, affirming the validity of the orders and the misuse of raw material. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=114451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 603 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76231</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the orders passed by the Additional Controller of Imports and Exports and the Appellate Committee. The Court found that the decision was made by the Committee, as stated in the order, and upheld the findings that the petitioners misused imported raw material. The Court ruled that no interference was warranted, affirming the validity of the orders and the misuse of raw material. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=76231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>